There is a bill that has been introduced in the Indiana Senate that, if passed, threatens to take away the ability to vote from people who live in long-term care facilities. It’s Senate Bill No. 366 and the summary of the bill is as follows:
My first reaction was
-- REALLY? Are adults -- mostly the
oldest old -- who require the highest level of institutional care really that
much of a threat when it comes to voter fraud?
Then I took a deep breath and began to think. What “proof of identification” is
acceptable? Does it have to be a birth
certificate or social security card? A
driver’s license or a passport? What
happens if the voter, in this case the resident, doesn’t have any of those
documents? What if a family member can’t
locate any of those documents? What if
there are no family members around who care?
Rather than trying to
squelch the ability to vote, I would rather celebrate the spirit and spunk of
someone in these circumstances who cares about exercising their right to
vote. If regulation is really
needed, let’s at least be creative enough to include in this bill a reasonable,
accessible way for a resident to provide proof. In addition to the “usual” forms of identification, perhaps some sort of
admission document to the facility might be accepted? Or some paperwork that includes a Medicare or
Medicaid number?
What a tragedy it will be if
this bill passes and results in taking away the right to vote for some of our
most vulnerable citizens -- citizens who may well have worked hard all their
lives, raised families, contributed to our communities or even fought for our
country.
Ellen W. Miller, PhD
Executive Director
Editor's note: Indiana citizens concerned about this bill can contact their senator by visiting the Indiana General Assembly website.
Executive Director
Editor's note: Indiana citizens concerned about this bill can contact their senator by visiting the Indiana General Assembly website.



1 Comment:
This saddens me. In dealing with aging family even in various stages of dementia they always knew when it was time to vote, and had a very strong opinion on who they wanted to vote for. Given the apathy of the general population, it's sad they are penalizing the generation that values the opportunity more than most.
Post a Comment